CURRENT NEWSLETTER - MAY 2008

Apr 2008
Mar 2008
Dec 2007

Another good response to our April newsletter, many thanks for your interest.
Our newsletter starts this month with information on boundary disputes.

BOUNDARY LOCATION and DISPUTES ARISING THEREFROM


A dispute over where a boundary is located can usually be solved by having a survey completed by a surveyor, who will mark the boundary (according to the land title documents) on the ground or on existing structures. A person who deliberately moves or removes a survey peg (other than to build on the boundary or as permitted under the Surveying Act 2002 (NSW) commits an offence. That person can be fined up to $10,000 and will be liable to pay for the boundary to be re-surveyed (s24).

Generally, if a fence is not on the proper boundary, it does not change the ownership rights to the land.

If a river or stream runs between two properties, the centre of the stream is usually the boundary, although this kind of boundary can change as the stream gradually cuts a new course.
A problem may occur when two properties are divided by a river, stream or lake, the bed of which is owned by the Crown. At common law the ad medium filum rule states that the boundary of lands divided by a stream lies along the centre line of the stream. However, the beds of all watercourses on lands sold by the Crown at least since 3 May 1918 have remained Crown property. In the case of such lands the logical position is that neither owner is able to take advantage of the Dividing Fences Act as the lands do not adjoin.

RETAINING WALLS


Retaining walls are not legally considered to be fences, although they may serve as footings for fences.
The rights and obligations of neighbouring landowners concerning the erection and maintenance of retaining walls are governed by the common law doctrine of support to land. Landowners have the right to the support of neighbouring land so that if excavation or other work on adjacent property results in damage to their land, they are entitled to monetary compensation or an injunction against the person causing the damage.

This right, best described as a natural right not to have the support of one’s land removed, is founded in the tort of private nuisance, which protects landowners from invasions of the use and enjoyment of their land. However, this right applies to land in its natural state and does not automatically extend to buildings on the land; although if the withdrawal of support would have resulted in damage (such as subsidence or erosion) to the land in its unaltered state, the amount recoverable may include damage to buildings.

Liability for the withdrawal of support is strict and does not depend on proof of negligence. Indeed, it has been established that an owner has no duty to take care that damage to neighbouring land does not indirectly result when making excavations, and is not liable for resulting damage in the absence of a right to support.

Next month: Use of Land, and Domestic Rainwater Tanks

OUR THOUGHT FOR THE MONTH


“If you always do what you’ve always done, you’ll always be where you are now”.

Need More Information?


For more information, visit our Contact Us page

Disclaimer


All visitors to this website are advised to visit our Disclaimer regarding the limited use of information provided on this website
 
Design by: Logo Pogo